Substance of the Political Participation Agreement

November 12, 2013

In the joint accord signed on November 6, 2013, negotiators representing the government of Colombia and the FARC-EP laid out a framework for “deepening and strengthening our democracy, broadening the rights and guarantees for the exercise of opposition, as well as the spaces for political and citizen participation.”  The accord “promotes pluralism and political inclusion, participation and transparency in electoral processes, and the strengthening of a democratic political culture.”  It recognizes that new political movements that emerge in the aftermath of a final accord will need special guarantees and protection.  With these general precepts in mind, the latest agreement addressed the three main sub-points on political participation laid out in the framework agreement:

  • Rights and guarantees for the exercise of political opposition in general and in particular for those new movements that might emerge following the signing of a Final Agreement; access to media.
  • Democratic mechanisms for citizen participation.
  • Effective measures to promote greater participation by all sectors, including the most vulnerable populations on equal footing and with safety guarantees, in national, regional and local politics.

Many details have yet to be worked out and the accord on political participation will only go into effect once a comprehensive peace agreement is reached, as per the terms of the framework agreement.  More particulars of the accord may be released in a report the parties have said they will release during the next round of talks beginning on November 18.

Democratization and Good Governance Key to Consolidating Peace

The Colombian government’s lead negotiator Humberto de la Calle has said that the latest agreement represents a “new democratic opening.”  He noted that “in order to achieve a solid peace, it is necessary to broaden, deepen, modernize and fortify our democracy, in order to make it more vigorous, participatory, pluralist, and transparent.”  He noted the need to “consolidate the rights of the opposition, to recognize and manage peacefully the irruption of social movements, to ensure that the right to protest does not impinge on the rights of those who do not participate in it, to open the door to new parties and introduce greater equity in their regulation, to generate a culture of co-existence, tolerance and respect, to offer security and dignity for the exercise of politics, to accentuate pluralism in the framework of respect for political opposition and to combat the vices that still persist in the electoral system.”

Democratization and good governance will provide the pillars for the sustainability of peace, and to the extent that the agreement is implemented it is likely to further all three.  The November 6th accord on political participation sets out a number of interesting proposals and mechanisms for increasing and protecting citizen engagement and opening up the Colombian political system to new voices and ideas.  If implemented, the political reforms it proposes will promote a transformation of Colombia’s elite-driven, exclusionary political system.

As President Juan Manuel Santos noted in his address announcing the latest accord on the evening of November 6th, “These are real, positive advances toward a final agreement and, in particular, toward a scenario that breaks forever the link between politics and arms.”

There is widespread satisfaction that the peace process appears to be delivering a joint vision that includes the rejection of the use of arms and promises political reforms that will guarantee greater participation and inclusivity.  With the exception of former President Alvaro Uribe’s party, which has called the announcement a “farce,” all of the other political parties (Conservative, Liberal, Polo Democrático, Partido de la “U”, Cambio Radical) have expressed support for the accord.  (See my last post on this topic.) Yesterday, the Central Command of the National Liberation Army (ELN), which is awaiting its own peace process, also came out in support of the accord between the FARC and the Colombian government.

The full accord on political participation in Spanish is available here; the following is a synthesis-commentary-translation into English of these proposals:

  1. The agreement calls for a national event to establish a Commission, made up spokespersons from political parties and movements, to define the guidelines for a statute that would provide guarantees for political participation and opposition politics.  The Commission will convene a forum to elicit proposals for the statute from social movements and organizations, experts, and academics.
  2. A second national event would be held to generate proposals from spokespersons from social movements and organizations (including new groups that might emerge from the final peace accord).  The event would provide inputs for legislation that will  guarantee and promote democratic participation of the citizenry, and channel and protect citizen engagement, including through mobilization, protests, and pacific co-existence within a broader democratic framework.
  3. New additional, unspecified spaces will be opened to give voice to proposals and projects–particularly peace-building projects–in institutional and regional media.  Community-based media will be strengthened to encourage citizen participation.

Citizen Engagement in Reconciliation and Good Governance 

A number of additional agreements relate to the need to establish a climate of “reconciliation, coexistence, tolerance.”  This includes not stereotyping people and employing a “language and behavior of respect for ideas.”  To this end, the accord calls for the establishment of national and territorially-based Councils for Reconciliation and Coexistence (Consejos para la Reconciliación y la Convivencia) to assist authorities with the implementation of the agreement.

The plan also anticipates the need for citizen participation and engagement in good governance.  The parties agreed on a plan to support citizen monitoring and accountability mechanisms, especially for implementing the Accord.  The parties  recognize that greater control by citizens will contribute to greater transparency and counter corruption in administration and public management.  The parties agreed on a comprehensive participatory review and monitoring of development plans as a “fundamental instrument for the peace-building stage,” and agreed to strengthen the territorial planning councils (consejos territoriales de planeación”).

Support for Political Pluralism and Electoral Reform

In order to consolidate peace, the parties agreed to make institutional changes that support political pluralism by facilitating the constitution of political parties and providing particular support for the transition of social organizations and movements into political parties or movements.  Special support would be given to new movements and political parties as a means of ensuring the political pluralism needed for the construction of peace.

The parties also approved a series of measures to assure transparency in electoral processes, particularly in the areas at greatest risk for fraud, and to promote greater participation of the citizenry living in the least accessible regions.  These measures would  further strengthen democracy and political pluralism.  Once the Final Accord is signed, a Mission of Experts will perform a comprehensive review of the current electoral system and, in keeping with best national and international practices, make recommendations for normative and institutional adjustments.

Special Transitory Seats for Peace

The political participation agreement creates Special Transitory Congressional Districts (Circumscriptions) for Peace to promote territorial integration and political inclusion of those regions most affected by the conflict and by neglect.  During a transition period, the   particular interests of these constituencies would be represented in the House of Representatives through these transitory seats, which would supplement the existing ordinary seats.  The seats would be accompanied by guarantees to ensure electoral transparency and to protect the electorate’s right to vote.

Creating extra representation for those who have been neglected by the state and have suffered the impact of the conflict seems to be a creative and appropriate form of reparation.  After a briefing by President Santos and the government negotiating team last week, Juan Fernando Cristo, President of the Colombian Congress, remarked that “the idea of a special Congressional district for the House of Representatives struck us all as a bold, novel idea that will signify a fundamental advance in the question of political representation for the inhabitants of those conflict zones.”  The particular regions to be granted these transitory seats have not yet been defined.

Areas suffering state neglect have tended be FARC strongholds, but interestingly, at this stage, the accord does not guarantee seats for direct FARC representation–a topic which has been the source of much press attention and debate.   Humberto de la Calle has noted that the conditions under which the FARC might transition into the political system or attain seats in the Congress will be dealt with when the third item on the Agenda related to disarmament and reintegration is taken up.

Security for Political Participation

The parties agreed on a comprehensive security system for the exercise of politics.  This system is envisaged within a framework of guarantees for the rights, duties, and freedoms of those who exercise politics.  It seeks to protect those who engage in politics on the basis of the respect for life and freedom of thought and opinion (particularly the new movement that might emerge from the FARC-EP into legal political activity) in order to strengthen and deepen democracy and contribute to a climate of coexistence and tolerance.  (The particular conditions of this transition will be discussed in Item 3 of the Agenda.)

The signing and implementation of the Final Accord will contribute to the broadening and deepening of democracy, in so far as it involves the setting aside of arms and the proscription of violence as a method of political action for all Colombians, for the purpose of transiting to a scenario where democracy prevails, with full guarantees for those who participate in politics, and in this way new spaces for participation will be opened.

Women’s Participation

Finally, it was agreed that everything referring to the point of political participation including its implementation would be carried out taking into account a gender approach and assuring the participation of women.  This issue has been the point of much international advocacy.  While the FARC have made some concerted efforts to ensure that women’s voices are heard–both through their new webpage, Mujer Fariana (launched on October 11, 2013), and the high profile it has given to women writers and guerrilla leaders on the FARC’s English page (farc-epeace.org) launched last August), it was still somewhat unfathomable to see the absence of women at the table when the negotiating teams announced the new accord.

Ethnic Diversity

There are currently no special provisions laid out in the political participation agreement that consider the relationship of Colombia’s ethnically diverse populations to the theme of political participation or that recognize explicitly the special political needs of Colombia’s indigenous and Afro communities.  There are, however, pending requests by organizations representing these communities to present proposals to the table in Havana.  (This is also the case with victims and women).  Consultation with these groups could well assist the negotiators in refining and operationalizing their framework so that it clearly addresses the particular security needs of these groups, recognizes the contributions of an ethnically diverse population to the consolidation of democracy, and promotes respect for the cultural, territorial, and political rights of its diverse populations.

Additional Points

The parties noted in their joint communiqué (read by Rodolfo Benitez and Dag Nylander, the guarantors from Cuba and Norway, respectively) that the agreement on political participation is part of a broader comprehensive peace agreement of six points that they “hope to achieve soon.”  The fourth point on the Agenda, “Solution to the Problem of Illicit Drugs,” will be the subject of the next round of conversations when they reconvene on November 18.

The communiqué noted, furthermore, that the delegates have created an office for displaying the objects and materials sent by the victims of the conflict to “show their respect for all of the victims of the conflict without distinction,” a theme to be taken up as the fifth point of the Agenda.  The delegations acknowledged the support of the UN office in Colombia, the Center for Reflection for Peace of the National University, the Peace Commissions of the Colombian  Senate and House of Representatives, the Colombian citizens and organizations who have submitted proposals through the forums, webpage, and surveys; and the four member nations of the Group of Friends constituted by Cuba, Norway, Chile and Venezuela; and the support from other nations, organizations, and leaders “who strengthen confidence in the path we are traveling.”

In a separate statement, Humberto de la Calle also acknowledged the hard work of both his own and the FARC’s negotiating teams.  (“Tengo que decir que la delegación de las Farc igualmente ha puesto empeño y disciplina. Debo reconocer que ha trabajado con gran seriedad”, noted de la Calle.)

Another Hurdle Cleared 

The accord is just what President Juan Manuel Santos needed to show progress and defend the continued pursuit of a peace accord.  Most here in Colombia think this will bolster his bid for re-election and ensure that the peace issue will be a major theme of the upcoming electoral season.  Polls following the announcement of the agreement showed an immediate surge in the President’s popularity from 41% last month to 55% in the days following the announcement of the political participation agreement.  President Santos is widely expected to throw his hat into the presidential ring within the next week or two.

Related articles

Advertisements

About Ginny Bouvier

Love reading, writing, thinking, and working with people to make the world a better place. Family and friends, yoga, travel, photography, perusing dessert menus keep me sane. Latin American enthusiast. Peace practitioner yearning for justice. Heading up the Colombia program at the U.S. Institute of Peace, but tweets and posts are my own.
Aside | This entry was posted in Colombia, Cuba, democratization, dialogos de paz, FARC, FARC-EP, Fuerzas Armadas Revolucionarias Colombianas, Government of Colombia, Latin America, Peace, peace agreements, peace processes, peace talks, political participation, Spanish America, Victims and Land Restitution Law, violence, Virginia Bouvier, Western Hemisphere and tagged , , , , , , , . Bookmark the permalink.

4 Responses to Substance of the Political Participation Agreement

  1. luzhelena07 says:

    Good synthesis Ginny. There is a point I want to make about women and young people for that matter. The issue of the codes of conduct imposed by the guerrilla to women and young people: how to dress, curfew hours, who they can relate, dress code,In essence, for years they have been ruled by different standards than the rest of women in Colombia. This is a serious issue that has to be addressed accordingly. Women and young people rights to autonomy can not be skipped.

    Like

    • Excellent point, Luz Helena. Any thoughts on how it might be addressed and where it would be most effective to do so?

      Like

      • luzhelena07 says:

        Thank you for giving me tha chance to explain better.
        How it might be addressed ? In plain language. Just get the women and youngsters to speak up. They have been victimized in manners that are rarely talked about. I do field work as a Public Health Researcher. I have to listen to people’s stories about their health situation… I have also traveled the country acompanying “Ruta Pacifica de las Mujeres por la solución negociada al conflicto armado “. I have talked to women’s organizations in Magdalena Medio. I have also heard indian women from Putumayo asking me to tell “para que les cuente allá donde usted vive ” I have seen the women in Choco, fearing ending a meeting beyond the bounderies of time regulation by the Paras. A Young beautiful woman from Putumayo told me this story in 1998 : ” los muchachos ( meaning the FARC) vinieron un día por donde yo vivo. Estaba con una blusa escotada. Ellos me dijeron que la orden es que las mujeres no provocáramos así. entonces yo les dije que tenia todo mi derecho. Y saben que me hicieron ?… “( se abrió el sweater y me mostro el cuello. Mas abajo, alrededor de lo que debió haber sido la línea prohibida, había una gran cicatriz, como un collar) . And so on at nauseam
        … Problem is that the new paras and the new bands are perpetuating this “moral code model ” in large urban áreas such us Medellín, Bogota, Cali…

        Y have a hypothesis about the new wave of violence against women in Colombia.
        And I fear very much that the coming accord with the FARC, and probably the ELN, will bring worse scenarios for women and youngsters.
        This is why I personally think that the issue of ” demilitarization “of the territories and the daily life of people has to be addressed at the table in Havana.. and beyond.

        Like

      • I agree. Women and youth have suffered inordinately in Colombia’s conflict. While the sexual violence is finally beginning to get some attention, the daily controls that are imposed in areas ruled by armed actors get much less attention. The Historical Memory Group’s reports on Mujeres y Guerra: Victimas y Resistentes en el Caribe Colombiano, and El Placer: Mujeres, Coca y Guerra en el Bajo Putumayo are particularly relevant to this point.

        Like

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out / Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out / Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out / Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out / Change )

Connecting to %s